The Importance of Visitation RightsBy Charles and Douglas
Salt Lake City, Utah
Like newlyweds the world over, Charles and Douglas were flying high on their return trip to Salt Lake City following their joyous marriage celebration in New York City in 2011. Hand in hand, they were still glowing after the ceremony that sealed the bond of their 12-year relationship. But onboard the flight back to Utah, a sobering thought began to sink in for Charles—the sad recognition that marriage equality was still something that existed only in a few states. He pulled aside a flight attendant and asked, “Will you let us know when we cross over into Pennsylvania? Because after that, we are no longer legal.”
Huge strides have been made in the past few years in the battle for marriage equality as one state after another slowly passes marriage equality. There have been success stories from traditionally liberal East and West coast states, and a huge win this summer when Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was struck down by the Supreme Court. But only 13 states and the District of Columbia have passed marriage equality laws, so the struggle continues.
Charles and Douglas describe their home in Salt Lake City as being at “the heart of the reddest of red states.” Charles jokes that they’ve chosen to live in Salt Lake City precisely because “someone has to live on the front lines.” But Utah is home to all of Charles and Douglas’ family and friends and—despite the discrimination they have experienced—they have stayed and advocated there in the battle for gay rights and marriage equality.
Charles, 57, is the Director of Community Engagement and Awareness for SAGE Utah at the Utah Pride Center. He was previously married to a woman and has four children and six grandchildren. Douglas, 53, works as a propane delivery driver for Suburban Propane. They have been together for nearly 12 years and were legally married in New York City in September of 2011. The marriage was not only an affirmation of their loving relationship, but also a huge personal and political achievement after the real and traumatic discrimination they have experienced because their commitment is unrecognized by the law.
The discrimination was most evident during a hospital crisis in 2009. While travelling, Charles became seriously ill and had to be hospitalized. Assuming things might not be easy at the hospital, Doug drove home to collect all of their legal documents that proved that he had authority over medical decisions and had the right to be by Charles’ side. He and Charles also made explicit statements to the hospital staff that they were partners. Despite all this, their statements went completely unheeded. The hospital personnel continued to refer to Douglas as Charles’ “friend.” They kept Douglas from Charles’ side during the whole ordeal—isolating him in a separate room and not sharing any information with him beyond a statement that Charles was likely to die. (!) No further information was released until Charles’ son arrived at the hospital several hours later. It’s hard to believe a hospital could be so uncaring.
The scars of discrimination gave Charles and Douglas an added incentive to tie the knot as soon as they could. They decided to marry in New York City in 2011 on one of their frequent theatre trips to the Big Apple. Alongside two lesbian couples, and in front of about 30 friendly faces that had come on the theatre tour, Charles and Douglas were thrilled to say “I do.” Charles recalls, “It was pretty cool. The fact that we know we are legal—at least in some states—is so important to us. That we are fully a couple under the law—that means a lot to us.”